A FATHER’S TOOLS AND THE TEARS OF THINGS


On the importance of a “handmade life”.

 

    You'd hear it every summer, ringing out across our lake. “Oh you bitch,” the call would go, “you sonova bitchova thing!” And you'd know my father was wrestling with the water pump, or had sawn a board short, or maybe stripped a thread. As a child when I heard that, I'd wince a little. Though his anger wasn't aimed at me, I'd feel it as a kind of sulphur in the air. And I'd wonder why, when the man was such a master at building and fixing things, he always seemed to be fighting them. Even as he lay dying, he cursed the i.v. tubes, the old iron weigh scale (it was a Mother to move), the hospital bed crank.


     This year as we cleared up after him we found a half-dozen hammers, the cheaper ones splintered with their heads broken off. Also the claw end of a crowbar he'd taken a torch to. Maybe he'd wanted to use the shaft, or maybe he'd been trying to lift some hopeless weight. But why did he have to clobber things so?


     I found part of the answer in a collection of work by the Saskatchewan poet Tim Lilburn. “Summer and you dig in the ground,” Lilburn writes with almost mystical insight, “because a shovel conducts sadness into the earth/ beckoning tears nitroglycerine down through itself into the black/ seriousness of the world...” So it was grief then, hot and explosive, that my father was dealing with. And directing not at his tools but through them.


     That fits with an old notion known as lacrimae rerum, the Tears of Things, which has it that Nature holds a kind of reservoir of sadness. You'll feel it in certain groves of trees, for example, pulling your own mood strangely downwards. They're not human tears, exactly. They don't seem to come out of the family or of a particular injustice, but simply out of the way things are .


     Now whether or not that's just a metaphor, it catches some of the huge, mute grief in many men. Cut off from a sense of belonging to the natural world, they rage in return, as if against their own mothers (“son of a bitch of a thing”). My Dad was probably doing that without knowing it. Crying for the nurturing he never got, or never allowed himself. The sorrow had to go somewhere . And what this suggests is that if we won't weep, won't get it out of the body, some thing in the world has to do it for us. That may explain the palpable sadness still left in his pitchfork, the long tapered handle of his tiling spade.


     As I see it, there's a lot of virtue in this idea. For one thing, it says there might just be a safe place, even a “home” for the male anger it seems we're trying to banish to another planet these days. Actually, men need some of that stuff, but what we don't can go just as well into the ground, where “nitroglycerine” breaks down and turns to tears. Food for flowers.


     At another level, it puts soul and consciousness back into a natural world we've too long viewed as inert, there simply for our use. That's akin to what women have done with the image of the Goddess. But where Goddess worship tends to emphasize the soft and nurturing, lacrimae rerum adds a healthy respect for the grittier side of things, their toughness and their tears. Men, God knows, desperately need a direct connection with the earth. This image offers it. It also suggests that the vegetable world is willing to accept our turmoil, especially if it means protecting other living creatures.


     The man who consciously or otherwise puts his anger into a shovel is conducting it safely away from women and children. Many of our fathers (though not, sadly, enough of them) were wise to this. Maybe it's what they meant when they would say “a good tool should take abuse,” implying that nothing else should have to. You get the hint of a forgiveness which things extend towards our brutishness and stupidity. For that they are given to carry, especially after years of use, the dark sweaty (and faintly erotic) stain that shows up in oak and hickory handles. I can't imagine the teflon you find in shovels nowadays holding that kind of juice. There's not enough soul in them.


     Good tools will last, and they will probably — here's the painful part — outlive us. My father, whom I loved, is gone; his hammer's still here. I can almost feel him when I hold it. But I have to confess the feeling’s alloyed. The other day when I missed nailing a stud, I heard the familiar acid call rising in my own throat. It had passed straight into me, like a fresh-hatched robin fed a worm.


     Earlier this summer I paddled out to a point mid-way in the lake my father's curses used to ring out over, and spread his ashes there. I didn’t weep then, but later, when on an impulse I've just begun to fathom, I picked up the cutoff crowbar I'd found, and flung it in after him.


video essay (4 mins.) produced for Hallmark Channel’s New Morning


adapted from a piece originally published
(1993) in the Globe and Mail








Out behind our place at “The Lake”.
My father, remarkably sturdy at age 63, looks stern and even threatening in this photo. 

At first this made me think of the old African teaching tale about a father who, incensed at his son’s stupidity in tossing away a rat they might have had to eat, strikes him with an axe. Which symbolizes the wounding that a father inevitably deals a son.


My wounding/shaming him in response was to become an intellectual. To make my living without having to dirty my hands.


The anger I have projected — too late — against my father, comes in part from regret at not having tackled him head-on while he was alive. Not having engaged in that archetypal struggle that a son, even if he loses (read Rilke’s poem A Man Watching), usually comes away stronger from.


But there’s an obvious reason my dad is glaring at me here.  His son the intellectual — whom he clearly loved in spite of all — is standing right in the way the tree might fall.

Author’s note (January 2011):


I’m struck, re-reading this piece now, nearly two decades after its first publication, at how neatly and unconsciously I managed to slip past the red heat of my own rage, and go instead for the softer, “safer” feeling of grief.  Slip past, that is, until the very end of the piece.


There’s much more I now could say about this. Part of my rage, I’m sure, was at feeling unacknowledged by him, incomplete in  my manhood because I didn’t know how to use these tools. Worse, didn’t want to know. I refused, until too late, to pick them up when I could have honoured my father’s “handmade life” by asking for his instruction, blessing.

My living, then and now, is made in a far less physical way than his was — in intangible, virtual, digital space, which I am convinced leaves a huge hole in the male psyche.


My current project, an interactive website for The National Film Board of Canada on the wisdom of “Old Hands” is an attempt to address — and begin to fill — this hole.